Trademark Law Briefs

a summary of recent 9th Circuit trademark decisions

« Google not violating the Lanham Act with Adwords
Recovery for unfair competition in California requires actual monetary harm »

Local nonprofit’s trade name not covered by Lanham Act

Stanislaus Custodial Deputy Sheriffs’ Association v. Deputy Sheriff’s Association of Stanislaus, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21729 (E.D. Cal. 2010).

Plaintiff, a nonprofit collective bargaining association, sued Defendant, an educational nonprofit, for infringement of its trade name.  Although most claims arose under state law, Plaintiff included a claim for misappropriation of trade name under the Lanham act and brought suit in Federal court.  Defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.  The court granted the motion with leave to amend.

The decision revolved around whether defendant’s use of plaintiff’s name both affects interstate commerce and is used in a commercial or competitive context.  Although plaintiff established used of its mark in interstate commerce via its web presence, plaintiff failed to allege that defendant’s infringement affected interstate competition.  Additionally, plaintiff failed to allege that defendant’s use was commercial or competitive with plaintiff’s use.

This entry was posted on Friday, March 12th, 2010 at 1:01 pm and is filed under Forum/Venue, Jurisdiction. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Local nonprofit’s trade name not covered by Lanham Act”

  1. pure green coffee extract Says:
    May 12th, 2013 at 8:10 am

    pure green coffee extract…

    Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Local nonprofit’s trade name not covered by Lanham Act…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Trademark Law Briefs is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).