Trademark Law Briefs

a summary of recent 9th Circuit trademark decisions

« Parody of political opponent’s mark covered by free speech
Court has no jurisdiction over foreign trademarks incidentally picked up by American press »

Bourbon battle can be fought in California instead of Kentucky

Rare Breed Distilling v. Heaven Hill Distilleries, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (N.D. Cal., 2010)

Plaintiff and Defendant both produce bourbon-based honey liqueurs that form the basis of a trademark infringement suit.  Although both companies are headquartered out of Kentucky, Plaintiff’s IP issues are handled by a distributor based out of San Francisco.  As a result, Plaintiff brought suit in the Northern District of California.  Defendant requested transfer of venue under 28 USC 1404(a).  The court declined to transfer because, on balance, the inconvenience to witnesses (etc.) did not outweight Plaintiff’s choice of forum.

This entry was posted on Monday, February 15th, 2010 at 1:16 pm and is filed under Forum/Venue. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Bourbon battle can be fought in California instead of Kentucky”

  1. TERRENCE Says:
    July 16th, 2012 at 11:20 pm

    < blockquote >< a href=”http://buy-meds.comsyhost.com/buy_viagra_en-us.html” >Buy Viagra< /a >< /b >< /blockquote >

    Buy Cheap Generic.Drugs Today!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Trademark Law Briefs is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).