Trademark Law Briefs

a summary of recent 9th Circuit trademark decisions

« Prior Publictation Exclusion Bars Insurance Coverage in Trademark Infringement Suit
Use it or lose it- Display the (R) symbol to get damages »

No Preliminary Injunction for Alleged Burrito Trade Dress Infringement

Ruiz Food Products v. Camino Real Foods, Inc., 2009 US Dist. LEXIS 105941 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Plaintiff alleged that Defendant’s new packaging for burritos (sold in multi-burrito packages) infringed on its trade dress.  Plaintiff filed for a preliminary injunction.  The court compared the packaging in question and determined that a preliminary injunction was not warranted but invited Plaintiff to refile the motion if it discovered evidence of actual confusion or evidence of a higher the degree of care in purchasing of Mexican food.

The court agreed with plaintiff that the overall look of its packaging could be subject to a trade dress claim.  The court also agreed that plaintiff’s evidence of its advertising budget was sufficient to establish secondsry meaning at the preliminary injunction stage.  However, the court then thoroughly compared the parties’ packaging and found that many of the similar items were functional or were weak.  Additionally, there was evidence that Defendant used many of the elements before Plaintiff, contradicting the allegation that Defendant intended to copy Plaintiff.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 at 9:35 am and is filed under Factual Analysis, Functionality, secondary meaning, trade dress. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Trademark Law Briefs is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).