Trademark Law Briefs

a summary of recent 9th Circuit trademark decisions

« No name change for NJWeedman

Court Clarifies Statutory Damages Cap in Contributory Infringement

Lous Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc. et al., 2011 U.S.App. LEXIS 18815 (9th Cir. 2011)

Malletier sued the server hosts of websites that sold counterfeit goods in the US.  At jury trial, all defendants were found guilty of contributory copyright and trademark infringement.*  The jury awarded the maximum statutory damages against each defendant without making a finding of joint and several liability.  The two defendants were the web host and the manager of the web host (not clear if this was alter ego liability or just a separate count).  In any event, the infringement claims were single acts of infringement, for which each defendant was liable, not separate acts of infringement by separate defendants brought together in one case.

The court first confirmed that contributory infringers are subject to statutory damage awards for trademark and copyright infringement. 

As for the cap on statutory damages, it can not be multiplied per defendant where the defendants are jointly and severally liable.  ”Statutory damages reach a maximum based on the number of protected works, not the number of  defendants.” 

* The trial court did let one defendant off the hook, finding the jury verdict couldn’t be supported based on the facts presented because the defendant only leased server equipment and did not actually offer hosting services.

Tags: contributory infringement, counterfeit, statutory damages, web hosting

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 14th, 2011 at 11:23 am and is filed under Counterfeiting, statutory damages. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Court Clarifies Statutory Damages Cap in Contributory Infringement”

  1. cc.o Says:
    March 13th, 2013 at 6:48 am

    cialis-…

    .@cialis.online” rel=”nofollow”>.…

  2. pril Says:
    March 13th, 2013 at 7:57 am

    prilosec…

    prilosec@over.the.counter” rel=”nofollow”>.…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Trademark Law Briefs is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).