2007 US App LEXIS 29871 (9th Cir 2007). Decided December 28, 2007
Ruling: Atrademark registration is prima facie evidence of the validity of a trademark and whether defendant has used the mark on the goods specified in the registration is irrelevant in establishing Plaintiff’s protectable interest.If there is a protectable interest, the next question is whether Defendant’s use of the mark creates a likelihood of confusion.(more…)
2007 US Dist LEXIS 92905 (CD CA 2007). Decided December 18, 2007
Ruling: Recent consumer surveys conducted by a plaintiff mark holder are not relevant as to the commercial impression of the mark at the time that the defendant adopted the mark.(more…)