<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhoades v. Avon</title>
	<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=1</link>
	<description>a summary of recent 9th Circuit trademark decisions</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: webpage</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=1#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>webpage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=1#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;webpage...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Rhoades v. Avon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>webpage&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Rhoades v. Avon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ny escorts</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=1#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>ny escorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=1#comment-6378</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ny escorts...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Rhoades v. Avon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ny escorts&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Rhoades v. Avon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
