<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Trademark Law Briefs</title>
	<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com</link>
	<description>a summary of recent 9th Circuit trademark decisions</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on OSC Regarding Licensing Agreement Venue Provision by hip to waist ratio</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=18#comment-8738</link>
		<dc:creator>hip to waist ratio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=18#comment-8738</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;hip to waist ratio...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » OSC Regarding Licensing Agreement Venue Provision...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>hip to waist ratio&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » OSC Regarding Licensing Agreement Venue Provision&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local nonprofit&#8217;s trade name not covered by Lanham Act by pure green coffee extract</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=63#comment-8605</link>
		<dc:creator>pure green coffee extract</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 16:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=63#comment-8605</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;pure green coffee extract...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Local nonprofits trade name not covered by Lanham Act...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>pure green coffee extract&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Local nonprofits trade name not covered by Lanham Act&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Approved as to form and content&#8221; isn&#8217;t a representation to the opposing party by best dating Sites</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=67#comment-8600</link>
		<dc:creator>best dating Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=67#comment-8600</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;best dating Sites...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Approved as to form and content isnt a representation to the opposing party...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>best dating Sites&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Approved as to form and content isnt a representation to the opposing party&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laches and prejudice by bambinin fanno oh!</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=22#comment-8436</link>
		<dc:creator>bambinin fanno oh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=22#comment-8436</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;bambinin fanno oh!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Laches and prejudice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bambinin fanno oh!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Laches and prejudice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A statement of &#8220;Substantially Exclusive Use&#8221; is not fraudulent just because of infringing and insubstantial use by third parties by weight Loss calculator</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=70#comment-8391</link>
		<dc:creator>weight Loss calculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 17:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=70#comment-8391</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;weight Loss calculator...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » A statement of Substantially Exclusive Use is not fraudulent just because of infringing and insubstantial use by third parties...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>weight Loss calculator&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » A statement of Substantially Exclusive Use is not fraudulent just because of infringing and insubstantial use by third parties&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Copyright Act can preempt Trade Dress claims by tworzenie stron www koszalin</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=77#comment-8344</link>
		<dc:creator>tworzenie stron www koszalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=77#comment-8344</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;tworzenie stron www koszalin...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Copyright Act can preempt Trade Dress claims...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>tworzenie stron www koszalin&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Copyright Act can preempt Trade Dress claims&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Applied Information Sciences Corp. v. eBay, Inc. by please click the next website page</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=12#comment-7984</link>
		<dc:creator>please click the next website page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 03:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=12#comment-7984</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;please click the next website page...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Applied Information Sciences Corp. v. eBay, Inc....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>please click the next website page&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Applied Information Sciences Corp. v. eBay, Inc&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recent Microsoft Default Judgments by luxpennyvacations.com</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=14#comment-7869</link>
		<dc:creator>luxpennyvacations.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 06:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=14#comment-7869</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;luxpennyvacations.com...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Recent Microsoft Default Judgments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>luxpennyvacations.com&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Recent Microsoft Default Judgments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rhoades v. Avon by webpage</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=1#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>webpage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=1#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;webpage...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Rhoades v. Avon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>webpage&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trademark Law Briefs » Blog Archive » Rhoades v. Avon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Court Clarifies Statutory Damages Cap in Contributory Infringement by pril</title>
		<link>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=115#comment-7451</link>
		<dc:creator>pril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://trademarklawbriefs.com/?p=115#comment-7451</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;prilosec...&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/prilosec-otc/7774905182/? prilosec@over.the.counter" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>prilosec&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/prilosec-otc/7774905182/? <a href="mailto:prilosec@over.the.counter"">prilosec@over.the.counter&#8221;</a> rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;>.&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
