Trademark Law Briefs

a summary of recent 9th Circuit trademark decisions

Archive for the ‘Declaratory Action’ Category

Bona fide intent to use should be backed up by documents

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

City of Carlsbad v. Shah, 2009 US Dist.  96890 (SD Cal 2009)

Plaintiffs announced the name “The Crossings at Carlsbad” for a new community golf course in October 2006.  On November 21, 2006, Defendant registered a number of domain names featuring variations on “the Crossings at Carlsbad.”  Beginning on November 30, 2006 he filed for several intent to use trademark applications in the name for golf related items and a golf course itself.  Plaintiff’s filed for trademarks in the name and associated logo beginning on July 16, 2007.  Plaintiffs filed a partial motion for summary judgment for a declaratory judgment regarding trademark rights.  The court granted the motion for summary judgment and authorized the USPTO to register Plaintiffs’ pending applications and deny registration of Defendant’s applications. (more…)

Posted in Declaratory Action, intent to use | No Comments »

Rhoades v. Avon

Saturday, November 24th, 2007

Rhoades V. Avon, 2007 US App LEXIS 24096 (9th Cir. 2007).  Decided October 15, 2007

Ruling: TTAB proceedings do not need to be completed as a prerequisite to bringing a declaratory action in Federal Court to determine whether one mark infringes another.
Threat of litigation made in settlement discussions are not inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 408. (more…)

Posted in Declaratory Action | No Comments »

    Avatar Legal
  • You are currently browsing the archives for the Declaratory Action category.

  • Pages

    • About Avatar Legal, PC
    • about the author
  • Archives

    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
  • Categories

    • attorneys fees (7)
    • California law (10)
    • Cancellation (2)
    • Conflict of Interest (1)
    • consumer surveys (1)
    • Counterfeiting (7)
    • Cybersquatting (3)
    • Declaratory Action (2)
    • default judgment (6)
    • descriptive/suggestive (1)
    • dilution (3)
    • Discovery (4)
    • Distinctive (1)
    • Factual Analysis (6)
    • False Endorsement (2)
    • First Amendment (4)
    • First Sale (1)
    • Forum/Venue (2)
    • Functionality (3)
    • Genericism (4)
    • Injunction (5)
    • intent to use (1)
    • Jurisdiction (4)
    • Laches (5)
    • Licensing (4)
    • likelihood of confusion (10)
    • Procedure (6)
    • secondary meaning (6)
    • statutory damages (3)
    • trade dress (3)
    • Uncategorized (10)
    • Use (1)
    • Validity of Mark (4)

  • Syndication

    • RSS Feed
    • RSS
    • Atom
    • Comments RSS

Trademark Law Briefs is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).