Trademark Law Briefs

a summary of recent 9th Circuit trademark decisions

Archive for the ‘Genericism’ Category

9th Cir. says generic words used as famous arbitrary marks receive anti-dilution protection from all other trademark uses

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

Visa International Services Association v. JSL Corp., 610 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2010)

Visa (the credit card giant) sued JSL who runs eVisa, an online site that teaches English as a second language.  JSL agreed that Visa’s mark was famous, but argued that his suggestive use based on the generic meaning must also be allowed Visa argued dilution by blurring (”which occurs when a mark previously associated with one product also becomes associated with a second”).  The trial court agreed with Visa, granting summary judgment.  The Court of Appeals affirmed this ruling. (more…)

Posted in Genericism, dilution | 1 Comment »

Generic business names can be protected by California unfair competition laws

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

Curren  v. San Diego Painting, 2009 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1856
March 4, 2009
California
Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 1st Division

Ruling: Trial Court did not err by granting a permanent injunction preventing plaintiff from using the geographically generic trade name “San Diego Painting” under California unfair competition law based on Defendant’s showing of secondary meaning.  (Unpublished Opinion) (more…)

Posted in California law, Genericism, secondary meaning | No Comments »

Apple obtains a consent judgment for trademark infringement

Thursday, June 26th, 2008

Apple Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc. 2008 US Dist. LEXIS 45241 (N.D. Cal. 2008); see also 2007 US Dist. LEXIS 36347 (N.D. Cal. 2007) for procedural/factual history of the case

 

Ruling: This case is an entry of a consent judgment between Apple Inc. (Plaintiff) and Podfitness Inc. (Defendant).  The judgment granted a permanent injunction of Defendant’s use of the term Pod in its title and the use of white ear buds in its logo.  The consent judgment states that such use infringes on Plaintiff’s registered trademark in the term “Pod” and common law trademark in the white ear buds resulting from trade dress and use in the silhouette advertising. (more…)

Posted in Genericism, dilution | No Comments »

Bylin Heating Sys. v. M&M Gutters, LLC

Sunday, November 25th, 2007

2007 US Dist LEXIS 80594 (ED Cal. 2007).  Decided October 31, 2007

Ruling: Defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion against Plaintiff’s cause of action for trademark infringement based on genericism denied because whether Plaintiff’s mark is generic is a question of fact meaning a triable issue of fact exists. (more…)

Posted in Genericism | No Comments »

    Avatar Legal
  • You are currently browsing the archives for the Genericism category.

  • Pages

    • About Avatar Legal, PC
    • about the author
  • Archives

    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
  • Categories

    • attorneys fees (7)
    • California law (10)
    • Cancellation (2)
    • Conflict of Interest (1)
    • consumer surveys (1)
    • Counterfeiting (7)
    • Cybersquatting (3)
    • Declaratory Action (2)
    • default judgment (6)
    • descriptive/suggestive (1)
    • dilution (3)
    • Discovery (4)
    • Distinctive (1)
    • Factual Analysis (6)
    • False Endorsement (2)
    • First Amendment (4)
    • First Sale (1)
    • Forum/Venue (2)
    • Functionality (3)
    • Genericism (4)
    • Injunction (5)
    • intent to use (1)
    • Jurisdiction (4)
    • Laches (5)
    • Licensing (4)
    • likelihood of confusion (10)
    • Procedure (6)
    • secondary meaning (6)
    • statutory damages (3)
    • trade dress (3)
    • Uncategorized (10)
    • Use (1)
    • Validity of Mark (4)

  • Syndication

    • RSS Feed
    • RSS
    • Atom
    • Comments RSS

Trademark Law Briefs is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).